CHAMBERLAIN NR 510 WEEK 3 APN LEADER INTERVIEW PROJECT – LATEST
IF You Want To Purchase A+ Work
then Click The Link Below For Instant Down Load
NR 510 WEEK 3 APN LEADER INTERVIEW PROJECT – LATEST
GUIDELINESWITH SCORING RUBRIC PURPOSE THE PURPOSE OF THIS
APPLICATION IS TO PROVIDE THE STUDENT AN OPPORTUNITY TO INTERVIEW AN ADVANCED PRACTICE
NURSE (APN) LEADER ABOUT COMPETENCIES NECESSARY FOR APN ROLE DEVELOPMENT.
COURSE OUTCOMES THROUGH THIS ASSIGNMENT, THE STUDENT WILL DEMONSTRATE THE
ABILITY TO: CO 2: INTEGRATE INTERPROFESSIONAL COLLABORATION AND INNOVATIVE
COMMUNICATION TO SUPPORT AND PROMOTE THE TEACHING-COACHING FUNCTION OF ADVANCED
PRACTICE NURSING (PO 3). CO3: ASSIMILATE PRIMARY CARE COMPETENCIES INTO
APN/SPECIALTY NURSE PRACTITIONER PRACTICE THAT EXEMPLIFY PROFESSIONAL VALUES,
SCHOLARSHIP, SERVICE, AND CULTURALLY COMPETENT GLOBAL AWARENESS AND SUPPORT
ONGOING PROFESSIONAL AND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT (PO 5). CO7: CRITICALLY ANALYZE
LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY ISSUES INCLUDING INDEPENDENT PRACTICE AND RESTRAINT
OF TRADE, AND BUSINESS AND LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FOUR ADVANCED PRACTICE
NURSING ROLES OF CNS, CNP, CNM, AND CRNA (PO 1, 9). CO8: EXAMINE THE
CONTRIBUTION OF VARIOUS INTERPROFESSIONAL COLLABORATION RESOURCES INCLUDING THE
ROLE DIMENSION OF CONSULTANT FOR ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSING(PO 3). CO9: EVALUATE
STRATEGIES FOR CONTRACT NEGOTIATION, CV/RESUME WRITING, CREDENTIALING, NATIONAL
BOARD CERTIFICATION, HOSPITAL PRIVILEGES, AND REIMBURSEMENT(PO 8). CO10:
DEVELOP VISIONARY LEADERSHIP SKILLS THAT COMBINE BEST EVIDENCE WITH NURSING
EXPERTISE TO SUPPORT QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, SAFETY, AND CHANGE ACROSS HEALTHCARE
ORGANIZATIONS AND SYSTEMS (PO 1, 3, 8, 9). CO11: DIFFERENTIATE LEADERSHIP
STRATEGIES THAT STRENGTHEN INTERPROFESSIONAL COLLABORATION AND INCORPORATE AN
ETHIC OF CARE, VALUES, AND ETHICAL PRINCIPLES INTO THE ROLE OF THE NURSE LEADER
ACROSS HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS AND SYSTEMS (PO 2, 4, 5, 6, 7). DUE DATE:SUNDAY
11:59 P.M. MT AT THE END OF WEEK 3 TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 150 REQUIREMENTS: 1.
TO COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION, YOU WILL NEED TO ACCESS TO THE FOLLOWING
DATABASES: CINAHL, MEDLINE, COCHRANE LIBRARY, AND THE JOANNA BRIGGS INSTITUTE.
YOU MAY ACCESS THESE DATABASES THROUGH THE CHAMBERLAIN COLLEGE OF NURSING
ONLINE LIBRARY 2. THEAPN LEADER INTERVIEW PROJECT WILL BE GRADED ON QUALITY OF
INFORMATION, USE OF CITATIONS, USE OF STANDARD ENGLISH GRAMMAR, SENTENCE
STRUCTURE, AND OVERALL ORGANIZATION BASED ON THE REQUIRED COMPONENTS AS
SUMMARIZED IN THE DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA/RUBRIC. 3. CREATE YOUR REPORT
USING MICROSOFT WORD 2007 (A PART OF MICROSOFT OFFICE 2007), WHICH IS THE REQUIRED
FORMAT FOR ALL CHAMBERLAIN COLLEGE OF NURSING DOCUMENTS. YOU CAN TELL THAT THE
DOCUMENT IS SAVED AS A MS WORD 2007 DOCUMENT BECAUSE IT WILL END IN “.DOCX” 4.
FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA CLOSELY. ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS
PROJECT MAY BE POSTED UNDER THE Q & A FORUM. 5. THE LENGTH OF THE PROJECT
REPORT IS TO BE NO LESS THAN 5 AND NO GREATER THAN 6 PAGES EXCLUDING TITLE PAGE
AND REFERENCE PAGES. 6. APA (2010) FORMAT IS REQUIRED WITH BOTH A TITLE PAGE
AND REFERENCE PAGE. USE THE REQUIRED COMPONENTS OF THE REVIEW AS LEVEL 1
HEADERS (UPPER AND LOWER CASE, CENTERED): A. INTRODUCTION B. DESCRIPTION OF THE
9 NONPF NP CORE COMPETENCIES C. DESCRIPTION OF THE INTERVIEW WITH THE APN. D.
ANALYSIS OF THE DISCUSSED APN COMPETENCIES E. CONCLUSION PREPARING THE PAPER
THE FOLLOWING ARE BEST PRACTICES FOR PREPARING THIS PROJECT PAPER: 1. READ
“.OUTLOOK/KIB4CNGZ/INTERVIEW%20SUGGESTIONS%20AND%20TIPS.PDF”>INTERVIEW
SUGGESTIONS AND TIPS” IN COURSE RESOURCES. 2. REVIEW THE
9.OUTLOOK/WEEK%204%20DISCUSSION%20AND%20ASSIGNMENT/NONPF%20CORE%20COMPETENCIES.PDF”>NONPF
NURSE PRACTITIONER CORE COMPETENCIES. 3. IDENTIFY AN APN WITH WHOM TO CONDUCT
AN INTERVIEW. THE APN SHOULD PRACTICE IN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING ROLES: CNS, CNP,
CNM, OR CRNA. 4. WHEN CONDUCTING THE INTERVIEW, BE SURE TO IDENTIFY APPROPRIATE
BACKGROUND INFORMATION REGARDING THE INTERVIEWEE (WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN, AND
WHY). 5. DISCUSS4-5 APN CORE COMPETENCIES WITH THE INTERVIEWEE. BE SURE TO
IDENTIFY APPROPRIATE DETAILS INCLUDING RELEVANT PRACTICE EXAMPLES GLEANED FROM
THE APN LEADER. 6. WHEN ANALYZING THE DISCUSSED APN COMPETENCIES, BE SURE TO
FULLY ADDRESS EACH APN COMPETENCY DISCUSSED IN TERMS OF ORIGINAL SOURCE AND
LEADER’S APPLICATION TO APN ROLE (I.E., NURSE PRACTITIONER CORE COMPETENCIES
[NONPF, 2011]). 7. CONCLUDE THE PAPER WITH A SUMMARY OF THE MAIN POINTS COVERED
IN THE PAPER AND THE BENEFITS OF MEETING THE COMPETENCIES WITHIN THE APN ROLE.
REFERENCE NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONER FACULTY [NONPF]. (2011).
NURSE PRACTITIONER CORE COMPETENCIES.WASHINGTON, DC: AUTHOR. CATEGORY POINTS %
DESCRIPTION INTRODUCTION 10 6 INTRODUCES THE INTERVIEW, PURPOSE OF THE
INTERVIEW, AND PROVIDES RATIONALE FOR ENGAGED INTERVIEW PROCESS. DESCRIPTION OF
THE NONPF CORE COMPETENCIES 30 20 PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE SUMMARY OF THE 9
NONPFCORE COMPETENCIES AS THEY RELATE TO APN PRACTICE. DESCRIPTION OF THE APN
LEADERINTERVIEWED 30 20 PROVIDE A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE APN LEADER SELECTED
FOR THIS INTERVIEW. INCLUDE RELEVANT INFORMATION REGARDING THE RATIONALE FOR
CHOOSING THE APN LEADER, THE APN’S ROLE AND SCOPE, PRACTICE DETAILS, PRACTICE
LOCATION, AND PATIENT POPULATION. ANALYSIS OF THE DISCUSSED APN COMPETENCIES 40
26 INCLUDE 4-5 SELECTED APN COMPETENCIES DISCUSSED IN TERMS OF ORIGINAL SOURCE
AND LEADER’S APPLICATION TO APN ROLE. INCLUDE SUBHEADINGS AS NEEDED. USE
EXAMPLES FROM THE INTERVIEW THAT SUPPORT YOUR ASSERTIONS AS WELL AS RELEVANT
EXAMPLES FROM THE APN LEADER’S ADVANCED PRACTICE SITUATION AND PERSPECTIVE.
CONCLUSION 20 13 AN EFFECTIVE CONCLUSION IDENTIFIES THE MAIN IDEAS AND MAJOR
CONCLUSIONS FROM THE BODY OF YOUR REPORT. MINOR DETAILS SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED.
SUMMARIZE THE BENEFITS OF MEETING SELECTED APN COMPETENCIES WITHIN THE APN
ROLE. CLARITY OF WRITING 15 10 USE OF STANDARD ENGLISH GRAMMAR AND SENTENCE
STRUCTURE. NO SPELLING ERRORS OR TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS. ORGANIZED AROUND THE
REQUIRED COMPONENTS USING APPROPRIATE HEADERS.ADHERES TO THE PAGE LIMIT OF 5-6
PAGES. APA FORMAT 5 5 ALL INFORMATION TAKEN FROM ANOTHER SOURCE, EVEN IF
SUMMARIZED, MUST BE APPROPRIATELY CITED IN THE REPORT (INCLUDING CITATION OF
INTERVIEW) AND LISTED IN THE REFERENCES USING APA (6TH ED.) FORMAT: DOCUMENT
SETUP TITLE AND REFERENCE PAGES CITATIONS IN THE TEXT AND REFERENCES. TOTAL 150
100 A QUALITY ASSIGNMENT WILL MEET OR EXCEED ALL OF THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS.
GRADING RUBRIC ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA EXCEPTIONAL OUTSTANDING OR HIGHEST LEVEL OF
PERFORMANCE EXCEEDS VERY GOOD OR HIGH LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE MEETSSATISFACTORY
LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE NEEDS IMPROVEMENT POOR OR FAILING LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE
DEVELOPING UNSATISFACTORY LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE CONTENT POSSIBLE POINTS = 150
INTRODUCTION 10 POINTS 9 POINTS 8 POINTS 4 POINTS 0 POINTS EXCELLENT
INTRODUCTION OF INTERVIEW PROCESS. RATIONALE IS WELL PRESENTED AND PURPOSE
FULLY DEVELOPED. THESIS STATEMENT IS WELL WRITTEN. GOOD UNDERSTANDING AND USE
OF INTERVIEW APPLICATION.THESIS STATEMENT NEEDS FURTHER DEVELOPMENT. BASIC
UNDERSTANDING AND/OR LIMITED USE OF INTERVIEW APPLICATION AND/OR INAPPROPRIATE
EMPHASIS ON AN AREA. THESIS STATEMENT NEEDS DEVELOPMENT. LITTLE OR VERY GENERAL
INTRODUCTION OF INTERVIEW PROCESS. LITTLE TO NO EXPLANATION; INAPPROPRIATE
EMPHASIS ON AN AREA. MISSING THESIS STATEMENT. NO INTRODUCTION PROVIDED.
DESCRIPTION OF THE NONPF CORE COMPETENCIES 30 POINTS 26 POINTS 24 POINTS 11
POINTS 0 POINTS EXCELLENT DISCUSSION OF THE 9 NONPF COMPETENCIES. INCLUDES
SUBHEADINGS SUPPORTED WITH REFERENCES. GOOD DISCUSSION OF SELECTED NONPF
COMPETENCIES.INCLUDES SUBHEADINGS SUPPORTED WITH REFERENCES. BASIC DISCUSSION
OF SELECTED NONPF COMPETENCIES. INCLUDES SUBHEADINGS SUPPORTED WITH REFERENCES.
LITTLE OR VERY GENERAL DISCUSSION OF NONPF COMPETENCIES. LITTLE OR NO
SUBHEADINGS OR REFERENCES. NO DISCUSSION OF SELECTED NONPF COMPETENCIES.
DESCRIPTION OF THE APN LEADER INTERVIEWED 30 POINTS 26 POINTS 24 POINTS 11 POINTS
0 POINTS PROVIDES A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE APN LEADER SELECTED FOR THIS
INTERVIEW. INCLUDES RELEVANT INFORMATION REGARDING THE RATIONALE FOR CHOOSING
THE APN LEADER, THE APN’S ROLE AND SCOPE, PRACTICE DETAILS, PRACTICE LOCATION,
AND PATIENT POPULATION. PROVIDES A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE APN INTERVIEWED,
BUT THE RELEVANT DETAILS REGARDING THE LEADER’S PRACTICE NEED FURTHER
EXPLANATION. PROVIDES A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE APN INTERVIEWED, BUT IS
MISSING RELEVANT DETAILS REGARDING THE LEADER’S PRACTICE. PROVIDES SOME
INFORMATION REGARDING THE APN INTERVIEWED. MISSING ALL RELEVANT DETAILS ABOUT
THE LEADER’S PRACTICE. DOES NOT INCLUDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE APN LEADER
INTERVIEWED. ANALYSIS OF THE DISCUSSED APN COMPETENCIES 40 POINTS 35 POINTS 32
POINTS 15 POINTS 0 POINTS EXCELLENT ANALYSIS OF 4-5 SELECTED APN COMPETENCIES
WITH APPLICATION TO APN ROLE, AND USE OF ORIGINAL SOURCE. GOOD ANALYSIS OF
SELECTED APN COMPETENCIES WITH APPLICATION TO APN ROLE, AND USE OF ORIGINAL
SOURCE. BASIC ANALYSIS OF SELECTED APN COMPETENCIES AND/OR ANALYSIS OF APN
COMPETENCIES NOT SUPPORTED WITH ORIGINAL SOURCE. LITTLE OR VERY GENERAL
ANALYSIS OF APN COMPETENCIES, OR MISSING ONE OR MORE OF THE ORIGINAL SOURCE(S).
LITTLE OR NO APPLICATION TO INTERVIEW AND/OR APN ROLE. NO ANALYSIS OF APN
COMPETENCIES PROVIDED. CONCLUSION 20 POINTS 18 POINTS 16 POINTS 8 POINTS 0
POINTS EXCELLENT UNDERSTANDING OF APN COMPETENCIES. CONCLUSIONS ARE WELL
EVIDENCED AND FULLY DEVELOPED. GOOD UNDERSTANDING AND/OR LIMITED USE OF APN
COMPETENCIES.CONCLUSIONS ARE WELL EVIDENCED AND FULLY DEVELOPED. BASIC
UNDERSTANDING AND/OR LIMITED USE OF APN COMPETENCIES AND/OR INAPPROPRIATE
EMPHASIS ON AN AREA. LITTLE UNDERSTANDING OF APPLICATION OF APN COMPETENCIES TO
ROLE. LITTLE TO NO EXPLANATION; INAPPROPRIATE EMPHASIS ON AN AREA. NO
UNDERSTANDING OF THE APPLICATION OF APN COMPETENCIES TO THE ROLE PROVIDED.
CONTENT SUBTOTAL _____OF 130 POINTS FORMAT POSSIBLE POINTS = 20 POINTS CLARITY
OF WRITING 15 POINTS 13 POINTS 12 POINTS 6 POINTS 0 POINTS EXCELLENT USE OF
STANDARD ENGLISH SHOWING ORIGINAL THOUGHT. NO SPELLING OR GRAMMAR ERRORS. WELL
ORGANIZED WITH PROPER FLOW OF MEANING. GOOD EVIDENCE OF OWN EXPRESSION AND
COMPETENT USE OF LANGUAGE. NO MORE THAN TWO SPELLING OR GRAMMAR ERRORS. WELL
ORGANIZED THOUGHTS AND CONCEPTS. SOME EVIDENCE OF OWN EXPRESSION AND COMPETENT
USE OF LANGUAGE. NO MORE THAN THREE SPELLING OR GRAMMAR ERRORS. WELL ORGANIZED
THOUGHTS AND CONCEPTS. LANGUAGE NEEDS DEVELOPMENT. FOUR-TO-SIX SPELLING AND/OR
GRAMMAR ERRORS. POORLY ORGANIZED THOUGHTS AND CONCEPTS. MORE THAN SIX SPELLING
AND/OR GRAMMAR ERRORS. POORLY ORGANIZED THOUGHTS AND CONCEPTS OR EXCEEDS THE
MAXIMUM LIMIT OF 6 PAGES. APA FORMAT 5 POINTS 4 POINTS 3POINTS 2 POINTS 0
POINTS APA FORMAT, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, AND/OR PUNCTUATION ARE ACCURATE, OR WITH
ZERO TO ONE ERRORS. TWO TO FOUR ERRORS IN APA FORMAT, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, AND
SYNTAX NOTED. FIVE TO SEVEN ERRORS IN APA FORMAT, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, AND SYNTAX
NOTED. EIGHT TO NINE ERRORS IN APA FORMAT, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, AND SYNTAX NOTED.
POST CONTAINS GREATER THAN TEN ERRORS IN APA FORMAT, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, AND/OR
PUNCTUATION OR REPEATEDLY MAKES THE SAME ERRORS AFTER FACULTY FEEDBACK. FORMAT
SUBTOTAL _____OF 20 POINTS TOTAL POINTS _____OF 150 POINTS
NR 510 WEEK 3 APN LEADER
INTERVIEW PROJECT – LATEST
GUIDELINESWITH SCORING RUBRIC PURPOSE THE
PURPOSE OF THIS APPLICATION IS TO PROVIDE THE STUDENT AN OPPORTUNITY TO
INTERVIEW AN ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSE (APN) LEADER ABOUT COMPETENCIES NECESSARY
FOR APN ROLE DEVELOPMENT. COURSE OUTCOMES THROUGH THIS ASSIGNMENT, THE STUDENT
WILL DEMONSTRATE THE ABILITY TO: CO 2: INTEGRATE INTERPROFESSIONAL
COLLABORATION AND INNOVATIVE COMMUNICATION TO SUPPORT AND PROMOTE THE
TEACHING-COACHING FUNCTION OF ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSING (PO 3). CO3: ASSIMILATE
PRIMARY CARE COMPETENCIES INTO APN/SPECIALTY NURSE PRACTITIONER PRACTICE THAT
EXEMPLIFY PROFESSIONAL VALUES, SCHOLARSHIP, SERVICE, AND CULTURALLY COMPETENT
GLOBAL AWARENESS AND SUPPORT ONGOING PROFESSIONAL AND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT (PO
5). CO7: CRITICALLY ANALYZE LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY ISSUES INCLUDING
INDEPENDENT PRACTICE AND RESTRAINT OF TRADE, AND BUSINESS AND LEGAL
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FOUR ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSING ROLES OF CNS, CNP, CNM, AND
CRNA (PO 1, 9). CO8: EXAMINE THE CONTRIBUTION OF VARIOUS INTERPROFESSIONAL COLLABORATION
RESOURCES INCLUDING THE ROLE DIMENSION OF CONSULTANT FOR ADVANCED PRACTICE
NURSING(PO 3). CO9: EVALUATE STRATEGIES FOR CONTRACT NEGOTIATION, CV/RESUME
WRITING, CREDENTIALING, NATIONAL BOARD CERTIFICATION, HOSPITAL PRIVILEGES, AND
REIMBURSEMENT(PO 8). CO10: DEVELOP VISIONARY LEADERSHIP SKILLS THAT COMBINE
BEST EVIDENCE WITH NURSING EXPERTISE TO SUPPORT QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, SAFETY,
AND CHANGE ACROSS HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS AND SYSTEMS (PO 1, 3, 8, 9). CO11:
DIFFERENTIATE LEADERSHIP STRATEGIES THAT STRENGTHEN INTERPROFESSIONAL
COLLABORATION AND INCORPORATE AN ETHIC OF CARE, VALUES, AND ETHICAL PRINCIPLES
INTO THE ROLE OF THE NURSE LEADER ACROSS HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS AND SYSTEMS
(PO 2, 4, 5, 6, 7). DUE DATE:SUNDAY 11:59 P.M. MT AT THE END OF WEEK 3 TOTAL
POINTS POSSIBLE: 150 REQUIREMENTS: 1. TO COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION, YOU WILL
NEED TO ACCESS TO THE FOLLOWING DATABASES: CINAHL, MEDLINE, COCHRANE LIBRARY,
AND THE JOANNA BRIGGS INSTITUTE. YOU MAY ACCESS THESE DATABASES THROUGH THE
CHAMBERLAIN COLLEGE OF NURSING ONLINE LIBRARY 2. THEAPN LEADER INTERVIEW
PROJECT WILL BE GRADED ON QUALITY OF INFORMATION, USE OF CITATIONS, USE OF
STANDARD ENGLISH GRAMMAR, SENTENCE STRUCTURE, AND OVERALL ORGANIZATION BASED ON
THE REQUIRED COMPONENTS AS SUMMARIZED IN THE DIRECTIONS AND GRADING
CRITERIA/RUBRIC. 3. CREATE YOUR REPORT USING MICROSOFT WORD 2007 (A PART OF
MICROSOFT OFFICE 2007), WHICH IS THE REQUIRED FORMAT FOR ALL CHAMBERLAIN
COLLEGE OF NURSING DOCUMENTS. YOU CAN TELL THAT THE DOCUMENT IS SAVED AS A MS
WORD 2007 DOCUMENT BECAUSE IT WILL END IN “.DOCX” 4. FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS AND
GRADING CRITERIA CLOSELY. ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS PROJECT MAY BE POSTED UNDER
THE Q & A FORUM. 5. THE LENGTH OF THE PROJECT REPORT IS TO BE NO LESS THAN
5 AND NO GREATER THAN 6 PAGES EXCLUDING TITLE PAGE AND REFERENCE PAGES. 6. APA
(2010) FORMAT IS REQUIRED WITH BOTH A TITLE PAGE AND REFERENCE PAGE. USE THE
REQUIRED COMPONENTS OF THE REVIEW AS LEVEL 1 HEADERS (UPPER AND LOWER CASE,
CENTERED): A. INTRODUCTION B. DESCRIPTION OF THE 9 NONPF NP CORE COMPETENCIES
C. DESCRIPTION OF THE INTERVIEW WITH THE APN. D. ANALYSIS OF THE DISCUSSED APN
COMPETENCIES E. CONCLUSION PREPARING THE PAPER THE FOLLOWING ARE BEST PRACTICES
FOR PREPARING THIS PROJECT PAPER: 1. READ “.OUTLOOK/KIB4CNGZ/INTERVIEW%20SUGGESTIONS%20AND%20TIPS.PDF”>INTERVIEW
SUGGESTIONS AND TIPS” IN COURSE RESOURCES. 2. REVIEW THE
9.OUTLOOK/WEEK%204%20DISCUSSION%20AND%20ASSIGNMENT/NONPF%20CORE%20COMPETENCIES.PDF”>NONPF
NURSE PRACTITIONER CORE COMPETENCIES. 3. IDENTIFY AN APN WITH WHOM TO CONDUCT
AN INTERVIEW. THE APN SHOULD PRACTICE IN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING ROLES: CNS, CNP,
CNM, OR CRNA. 4. WHEN CONDUCTING THE INTERVIEW, BE SURE TO IDENTIFY APPROPRIATE
BACKGROUND INFORMATION REGARDING THE INTERVIEWEE (WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN, AND
WHY). 5. DISCUSS4-5 APN CORE COMPETENCIES WITH THE INTERVIEWEE. BE SURE TO
IDENTIFY APPROPRIATE DETAILS INCLUDING RELEVANT PRACTICE EXAMPLES GLEANED FROM
THE APN LEADER. 6. WHEN ANALYZING THE DISCUSSED APN COMPETENCIES, BE SURE TO
FULLY ADDRESS EACH APN COMPETENCY DISCUSSED IN TERMS OF ORIGINAL SOURCE AND
LEADER’S APPLICATION TO APN ROLE (I.E., NURSE PRACTITIONER CORE COMPETENCIES
[NONPF, 2011]). 7. CONCLUDE THE PAPER WITH A SUMMARY OF THE MAIN POINTS COVERED
IN THE PAPER AND THE BENEFITS OF MEETING THE COMPETENCIES WITHIN THE APN ROLE.
REFERENCE NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONER FACULTY [NONPF]. (2011).
NURSE PRACTITIONER CORE COMPETENCIES.WASHINGTON, DC: AUTHOR. CATEGORY POINTS %
DESCRIPTION INTRODUCTION 10 6 INTRODUCES THE INTERVIEW, PURPOSE OF THE INTERVIEW,
AND PROVIDES RATIONALE FOR ENGAGED INTERVIEW PROCESS. DESCRIPTION OF THE NONPF
CORE COMPETENCIES 30 20 PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE SUMMARY OF THE 9 NONPFCORE
COMPETENCIES AS THEY RELATE TO APN PRACTICE. DESCRIPTION OF THE APN
LEADERINTERVIEWED 30 20 PROVIDE A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE APN LEADER SELECTED
FOR THIS INTERVIEW. INCLUDE RELEVANT INFORMATION REGARDING THE RATIONALE FOR
CHOOSING THE APN LEADER, THE APN’S ROLE AND SCOPE, PRACTICE DETAILS, PRACTICE
LOCATION, AND PATIENT POPULATION. ANALYSIS OF THE DISCUSSED APN COMPETENCIES 40
26 INCLUDE 4-5 SELECTED APN COMPETENCIES DISCUSSED IN TERMS OF ORIGINAL SOURCE
AND LEADER’S APPLICATION TO APN ROLE. INCLUDE SUBHEADINGS AS NEEDED. USE
EXAMPLES FROM THE INTERVIEW THAT SUPPORT YOUR ASSERTIONS AS WELL AS RELEVANT
EXAMPLES FROM THE APN LEADER’S ADVANCED PRACTICE SITUATION AND PERSPECTIVE.
CONCLUSION 20 13 AN EFFECTIVE CONCLUSION IDENTIFIES THE MAIN IDEAS AND MAJOR
CONCLUSIONS FROM THE BODY OF YOUR REPORT. MINOR DETAILS SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED.
SUMMARIZE THE BENEFITS OF MEETING SELECTED APN COMPETENCIES WITHIN THE APN
ROLE. CLARITY OF WRITING 15 10 USE OF STANDARD ENGLISH GRAMMAR AND SENTENCE
STRUCTURE. NO SPELLING ERRORS OR TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS. ORGANIZED AROUND THE
REQUIRED COMPONENTS USING APPROPRIATE HEADERS.ADHERES TO THE PAGE LIMIT OF 5-6
PAGES. APA FORMAT 5 5 ALL INFORMATION TAKEN FROM ANOTHER SOURCE, EVEN IF
SUMMARIZED, MUST BE APPROPRIATELY CITED IN THE REPORT (INCLUDING CITATION OF
INTERVIEW) AND LISTED IN THE REFERENCES USING APA (6TH ED.) FORMAT: DOCUMENT SETUP
TITLE AND REFERENCE PAGES CITATIONS IN THE TEXT AND REFERENCES. TOTAL 150 100 A
QUALITY ASSIGNMENT WILL MEET OR EXCEED ALL OF THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS. GRADING
RUBRIC ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA EXCEPTIONAL OUTSTANDING OR HIGHEST LEVEL OF
PERFORMANCE EXCEEDS VERY GOOD OR HIGH LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE MEETSSATISFACTORY
LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE NEEDS IMPROVEMENT POOR OR FAILING LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE
DEVELOPING UNSATISFACTORY LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE CONTENT POSSIBLE POINTS = 150
INTRODUCTION 10 POINTS 9 POINTS 8 POINTS 4 POINTS 0 POINTS EXCELLENT
INTRODUCTION OF INTERVIEW PROCESS. RATIONALE IS WELL PRESENTED AND PURPOSE
FULLY DEVELOPED. THESIS STATEMENT IS WELL WRITTEN. GOOD UNDERSTANDING AND USE
OF INTERVIEW APPLICATION.THESIS STATEMENT NEEDS FURTHER DEVELOPMENT. BASIC
UNDERSTANDING AND/OR LIMITED USE OF INTERVIEW APPLICATION AND/OR INAPPROPRIATE
EMPHASIS ON AN AREA. THESIS STATEMENT NEEDS DEVELOPMENT. LITTLE OR VERY GENERAL
INTRODUCTION OF INTERVIEW PROCESS. LITTLE TO NO EXPLANATION; INAPPROPRIATE
EMPHASIS ON AN AREA. MISSING THESIS STATEMENT. NO INTRODUCTION PROVIDED.
DESCRIPTION OF THE NONPF CORE COMPETENCIES 30 POINTS 26 POINTS 24 POINTS 11
POINTS 0 POINTS EXCELLENT DISCUSSION OF THE 9 NONPF COMPETENCIES. INCLUDES
SUBHEADINGS SUPPORTED WITH REFERENCES. GOOD DISCUSSION OF SELECTED NONPF
COMPETENCIES.INCLUDES SUBHEADINGS SUPPORTED WITH REFERENCES. BASIC DISCUSSION
OF SELECTED NONPF COMPETENCIES. INCLUDES SUBHEADINGS SUPPORTED WITH REFERENCES.
LITTLE OR VERY GENERAL DISCUSSION OF NONPF COMPETENCIES. LITTLE OR NO
SUBHEADINGS OR REFERENCES. NO DISCUSSION OF SELECTED NONPF COMPETENCIES.
DESCRIPTION OF THE APN LEADER INTERVIEWED 30 POINTS 26 POINTS 24 POINTS 11
POINTS 0 POINTS PROVIDES A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE APN LEADER SELECTED FOR
THIS INTERVIEW. INCLUDES RELEVANT INFORMATION REGARDING THE RATIONALE FOR
CHOOSING THE APN LEADER, THE APN’S ROLE AND SCOPE, PRACTICE DETAILS, PRACTICE
LOCATION, AND PATIENT POPULATION. PROVIDES A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE APN
INTERVIEWED, BUT THE RELEVANT DETAILS REGARDING THE LEADER’S PRACTICE NEED FURTHER
EXPLANATION. PROVIDES A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE APN INTERVIEWED, BUT IS
MISSING RELEVANT DETAILS REGARDING THE LEADER’S PRACTICE. PROVIDES SOME
INFORMATION REGARDING THE APN INTERVIEWED. MISSING ALL RELEVANT DETAILS ABOUT
THE LEADER’S PRACTICE. DOES NOT INCLUDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE APN LEADER
INTERVIEWED. ANALYSIS OF THE DISCUSSED APN COMPETENCIES 40 POINTS 35 POINTS 32
POINTS 15 POINTS 0 POINTS EXCELLENT ANALYSIS OF 4-5 SELECTED APN COMPETENCIES
WITH APPLICATION TO APN ROLE, AND USE OF ORIGINAL SOURCE. GOOD ANALYSIS OF
SELECTED APN COMPETENCIES WITH APPLICATION TO APN ROLE, AND USE OF ORIGINAL
SOURCE. BASIC ANALYSIS OF SELECTED APN COMPETENCIES AND/OR ANALYSIS OF APN
COMPETENCIES NOT SUPPORTED WITH ORIGINAL SOURCE. LITTLE OR VERY GENERAL
ANALYSIS OF APN COMPETENCIES, OR MISSING ONE OR MORE OF THE ORIGINAL SOURCE(S).
LITTLE OR NO APPLICATION TO INTERVIEW AND/OR APN ROLE. NO ANALYSIS OF APN
COMPETENCIES PROVIDED. CONCLUSION 20 POINTS 18 POINTS 16 POINTS 8 POINTS 0
POINTS EXCELLENT UNDERSTANDING OF APN COMPETENCIES. CONCLUSIONS ARE WELL
EVIDENCED AND FULLY DEVELOPED. GOOD UNDERSTANDING AND/OR LIMITED USE OF APN
COMPETENCIES.CONCLUSIONS ARE WELL EVIDENCED AND FULLY DEVELOPED. BASIC
UNDERSTANDING AND/OR LIMITED USE OF APN COMPETENCIES AND/OR INAPPROPRIATE EMPHASIS
ON AN AREA. LITTLE UNDERSTANDING OF APPLICATION OF APN COMPETENCIES TO ROLE.
LITTLE TO NO EXPLANATION; INAPPROPRIATE EMPHASIS ON AN AREA. NO UNDERSTANDING
OF THE APPLICATION OF APN COMPETENCIES TO THE ROLE PROVIDED. CONTENT SUBTOTAL
_____OF 130 POINTS FORMAT POSSIBLE POINTS = 20 POINTS CLARITY OF WRITING 15
POINTS 13 POINTS 12 POINTS 6 POINTS 0 POINTS EXCELLENT USE OF STANDARD ENGLISH
SHOWING ORIGINAL THOUGHT. NO SPELLING OR GRAMMAR ERRORS. WELL ORGANIZED WITH
PROPER FLOW OF MEANING. GOOD EVIDENCE OF OWN EXPRESSION AND COMPETENT USE OF
LANGUAGE. NO MORE THAN TWO SPELLING OR GRAMMAR ERRORS. WELL ORGANIZED THOUGHTS
AND CONCEPTS. SOME EVIDENCE OF OWN EXPRESSION AND COMPETENT USE OF LANGUAGE. NO
MORE THAN THREE SPELLING OR GRAMMAR ERRORS. WELL ORGANIZED THOUGHTS AND
CONCEPTS. LANGUAGE NEEDS DEVELOPMENT. FOUR-TO-SIX SPELLING AND/OR GRAMMAR
ERRORS. POORLY ORGANIZED THOUGHTS AND CONCEPTS. MORE THAN SIX SPELLING AND/OR
GRAMMAR ERRORS. POORLY ORGANIZED THOUGHTS AND CONCEPTS OR EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM
LIMIT OF 6 PAGES. APA FORMAT 5 POINTS 4 POINTS 3POINTS 2 POINTS 0 POINTS APA
FORMAT, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, AND/OR PUNCTUATION ARE ACCURATE, OR WITH ZERO TO ONE
ERRORS. TWO TO FOUR ERRORS IN APA FORMAT, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, AND SYNTAX NOTED.
FIVE TO SEVEN ERRORS IN APA FORMAT, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, AND SYNTAX NOTED. EIGHT
TO NINE ERRORS IN APA FORMAT, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, AND SYNTAX NOTED. POST
CONTAINS GREATER THAN TEN ERRORS IN APA FORMAT, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, AND/OR
PUNCTUATION OR REPEATEDLY MAKES THE SAME ERRORS AFTER FACULTY FEEDBACK. FORMAT
SUBTOTAL _____OF 20 POINTS TOTAL POINTS _____OF 150 POINTS
NR 510 WEEK 3 APN LEADER
INTERVIEW PROJECT – LATEST
GUIDELINESWITH SCORING RUBRIC PURPOSE THE
PURPOSE OF THIS APPLICATION IS TO PROVIDE THE STUDENT AN OPPORTUNITY TO
INTERVIEW AN ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSE (APN) LEADER ABOUT COMPETENCIES NECESSARY
FOR APN ROLE DEVELOPMENT. COURSE OUTCOMES THROUGH THIS ASSIGNMENT, THE STUDENT
WILL DEMONSTRATE THE ABILITY TO: CO 2: INTEGRATE INTERPROFESSIONAL
COLLABORATION AND INNOVATIVE COMMUNICATION TO SUPPORT AND PROMOTE THE
TEACHING-COACHING FUNCTION OF ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSING (PO 3). CO3: ASSIMILATE
PRIMARY CARE COMPETENCIES INTO APN/SPECIALTY NURSE PRACTITIONER PRACTICE THAT
EXEMPLIFY PROFESSIONAL VALUES, SCHOLARSHIP, SERVICE, AND CULTURALLY COMPETENT
GLOBAL AWARENESS AND SUPPORT ONGOING PROFESSIONAL AND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT (PO
5). CO7: CRITICALLY ANALYZE LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY ISSUES INCLUDING
INDEPENDENT PRACTICE AND RESTRAINT OF TRADE, AND BUSINESS AND LEGAL
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FOUR ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSING ROLES OF CNS, CNP, CNM, AND
CRNA (PO 1, 9). CO8: EXAMINE THE CONTRIBUTION OF VARIOUS INTERPROFESSIONAL
COLLABORATION RESOURCES INCLUDING THE ROLE DIMENSION OF CONSULTANT FOR ADVANCED
PRACTICE NURSING(PO 3). CO9: EVALUATE STRATEGIES FOR CONTRACT NEGOTIATION,
CV/RESUME WRITING, CREDENTIALING, NATIONAL BOARD CERTIFICATION, HOSPITAL
PRIVILEGES, AND REIMBURSEMENT(PO 8). CO10: DEVELOP VISIONARY LEADERSHIP SKILLS
THAT COMBINE BEST EVIDENCE WITH NURSING EXPERTISE TO SUPPORT QUALITY
IMPROVEMENT, SAFETY, AND CHANGE ACROSS HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS AND SYSTEMS (PO
1, 3, 8, 9). CO11: DIFFERENTIATE LEADERSHIP STRATEGIES THAT STRENGTHEN
INTERPROFESSIONAL COLLABORATION AND INCORPORATE AN ETHIC OF CARE, VALUES, AND
ETHICAL PRINCIPLES INTO THE ROLE OF THE NURSE LEADER ACROSS HEALTHCARE
ORGANIZATIONS AND SYSTEMS (PO 2, 4, 5, 6, 7). DUE DATE:SUNDAY 11:59 P.M. MT AT
THE END OF WEEK 3 TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 150 REQUIREMENTS: 1. TO COMPLETE THIS
APPLICATION, YOU WILL NEED TO ACCESS TO THE FOLLOWING DATABASES: CINAHL,
MEDLINE, COCHRANE LIBRARY, AND THE JOANNA BRIGGS INSTITUTE. YOU MAY ACCESS
THESE DATABASES THROUGH THE CHAMBERLAIN COLLEGE OF NURSING ONLINE LIBRARY 2.
THEAPN LEADER INTERVIEW PROJECT WILL BE GRADED ON QUALITY OF INFORMATION, USE
OF CITATIONS, USE OF STANDARD ENGLISH GRAMMAR, SENTENCE STRUCTURE, AND OVERALL
ORGANIZATION BASED ON THE REQUIRED COMPONENTS AS SUMMARIZED IN THE DIRECTIONS
AND GRADING CRITERIA/RUBRIC. 3. CREATE YOUR REPORT USING MICROSOFT WORD 2007 (A
PART OF MICROSOFT OFFICE 2007), WHICH IS THE REQUIRED FORMAT FOR ALL
CHAMBERLAIN COLLEGE OF NURSING DOCUMENTS. YOU CAN TELL THAT THE DOCUMENT IS
SAVED AS A MS WORD 2007 DOCUMENT BECAUSE IT WILL END IN “.DOCX” 4. FOLLOW THE
DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA CLOSELY. ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS PROJECT MAY
BE POSTED UNDER THE Q & A FORUM. 5. THE LENGTH OF THE PROJECT REPORT IS TO
BE NO LESS THAN 5 AND NO GREATER THAN 6 PAGES EXCLUDING TITLE PAGE AND
REFERENCE PAGES. 6. APA (2010) FORMAT IS REQUIRED WITH BOTH A TITLE PAGE AND
REFERENCE PAGE. USE THE REQUIRED COMPONENTS OF THE REVIEW AS LEVEL 1 HEADERS
(UPPER AND LOWER CASE, CENTERED): A. INTRODUCTION B. DESCRIPTION OF THE 9 NONPF
NP CORE COMPETENCIES C. DESCRIPTION OF THE INTERVIEW WITH THE APN. D. ANALYSIS
OF THE DISCUSSED APN COMPETENCIES E. CONCLUSION PREPARING THE PAPER THE
FOLLOWING ARE BEST PRACTICES FOR PREPARING THIS PROJECT PAPER: 1. READ
“.OUTLOOK/KIB4CNGZ/INTERVIEW%20SUGGESTIONS%20AND%20TIPS.PDF”>INTERVIEW
SUGGESTIONS AND TIPS” IN COURSE RESOURCES. 2. REVIEW THE
9.OUTLOOK/WEEK%204%20DISCUSSION%20AND%20ASSIGNMENT/NONPF%20CORE%20COMPETENCIES.PDF”>NONPF
NURSE PRACTITIONER CORE COMPETENCIES. 3. IDENTIFY AN APN WITH WHOM TO CONDUCT
AN INTERVIEW. THE APN SHOULD PRACTICE IN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING ROLES: CNS, CNP,
CNM, OR CRNA. 4. WHEN CONDUCTING THE INTERVIEW, BE SURE TO IDENTIFY APPROPRIATE
BACKGROUND INFORMATION REGARDING THE INTERVIEWEE (WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN, AND
WHY). 5. DISCUSS4-5 APN CORE COMPETENCIES WITH THE INTERVIEWEE. BE SURE TO
IDENTIFY APPROPRIATE DETAILS INCLUDING RELEVANT PRACTICE EXAMPLES GLEANED FROM
THE APN LEADER. 6. WHEN ANALYZING THE DISCUSSED APN COMPETENCIES, BE SURE TO
FULLY ADDRESS EACH APN COMPETENCY DISCUSSED IN TERMS OF ORIGINAL SOURCE AND
LEADER’S APPLICATION TO APN ROLE (I.E., NURSE PRACTITIONER CORE COMPETENCIES
[NONPF, 2011]). 7. CONCLUDE THE PAPER WITH A SUMMARY OF THE MAIN POINTS COVERED
IN THE PAPER AND THE BENEFITS OF MEETING THE COMPETENCIES WITHIN THE APN ROLE.
REFERENCE NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONER FACULTY [NONPF]. (2011).
NURSE PRACTITIONER CORE COMPETENCIES.WASHINGTON, DC: AUTHOR. CATEGORY POINTS %
DESCRIPTION INTRODUCTION 10 6 INTRODUCES THE INTERVIEW, PURPOSE OF THE
INTERVIEW, AND PROVIDES RATIONALE FOR ENGAGED INTERVIEW PROCESS. DESCRIPTION OF
THE NONPF CORE COMPETENCIES 30 20 PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE SUMMARY OF THE 9
NONPFCORE COMPETENCIES AS THEY RELATE TO APN PRACTICE. DESCRIPTION OF THE APN
LEADERINTERVIEWED 30 20 PROVIDE A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE APN LEADER SELECTED
FOR THIS INTERVIEW. INCLUDE RELEVANT INFORMATION REGARDING THE RATIONALE FOR CHOOSING
THE APN LEADER, THE APN’S ROLE AND SCOPE, PRACTICE DETAILS, PRACTICE LOCATION,
AND PATIENT POPULATION. ANALYSIS OF THE DISCUSSED APN COMPETENCIES 40 26
INCLUDE 4-5 SELECTED APN COMPETENCIES DISCUSSED IN TERMS OF ORIGINAL SOURCE AND
LEADER’S APPLICATION TO APN ROLE. INCLUDE SUBHEADINGS AS NEEDED. USE EXAMPLES
FROM THE INTERVIEW THAT SUPPORT YOUR ASSERTIONS AS WELL AS RELEVANT EXAMPLES
FROM THE APN LEADER’S ADVANCED PRACTICE SITUATION AND PERSPECTIVE. CONCLUSION
20 13 AN EFFECTIVE CONCLUSION IDENTIFIES THE MAIN IDEAS AND MAJOR CONCLUSIONS
FROM THE BODY OF YOUR REPORT. MINOR DETAILS SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED. SUMMARIZE
THE BENEFITS OF MEETING SELECTED APN COMPETENCIES WITHIN THE APN ROLE. CLARITY
OF WRITING 15 10 USE OF STANDARD ENGLISH GRAMMAR AND SENTENCE STRUCTURE. NO
SPELLING ERRORS OR TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS. ORGANIZED AROUND THE REQUIRED
COMPONENTS USING APPROPRIATE HEADERS.ADHERES TO THE PAGE LIMIT OF 5-6 PAGES.
APA FORMAT 5 5 ALL INFORMATION TAKEN FROM ANOTHER SOURCE, EVEN IF SUMMARIZED,
MUST BE APPROPRIATELY CITED IN THE REPORT (INCLUDING CITATION OF INTERVIEW) AND
LISTED IN THE REFERENCES USING APA (6TH ED.) FORMAT: DOCUMENT SETUP TITLE AND
REFERENCE PAGES CITATIONS IN THE TEXT AND REFERENCES. TOTAL 150 100 A QUALITY
ASSIGNMENT WILL MEET OR EXCEED ALL OF THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS. GRADING RUBRIC
ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA EXCEPTIONAL OUTSTANDING OR HIGHEST LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE
EXCEEDS VERY GOOD OR HIGH LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE MEETSSATISFACTORY LEVEL OF
PERFORMANCE NEEDS IMPROVEMENT POOR OR FAILING LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE DEVELOPING
UNSATISFACTORY LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE CONTENT POSSIBLE POINTS = 150 INTRODUCTION
10 POINTS 9 POINTS 8 POINTS 4 POINTS 0 POINTS EXCELLENT INTRODUCTION OF
INTERVIEW PROCESS. RATIONALE IS WELL PRESENTED AND PURPOSE FULLY DEVELOPED.
THESIS STATEMENT IS WELL WRITTEN. GOOD UNDERSTANDING AND USE OF INTERVIEW
APPLICATION.THESIS STATEMENT NEEDS FURTHER DEVELOPMENT. BASIC UNDERSTANDING
AND/OR LIMITED USE OF INTERVIEW APPLICATION AND/OR INAPPROPRIATE EMPHASIS ON AN
AREA. THESIS STATEMENT NEEDS DEVELOPMENT. LITTLE OR VERY GENERAL INTRODUCTION
OF INTERVIEW PROCESS. LITTLE TO NO EXPLANATION; INAPPROPRIATE EMPHASIS ON AN
AREA. MISSING THESIS STATEMENT. NO INTRODUCTION PROVIDED. DESCRIPTION OF THE
NONPF CORE COMPETENCIES 30 POINTS 26 POINTS 24 POINTS 11 POINTS 0 POINTS
EXCELLENT DISCUSSION OF THE 9 NONPF COMPETENCIES. INCLUDES SUBHEADINGS
SUPPORTED WITH REFERENCES. GOOD DISCUSSION OF SELECTED NONPF
COMPETENCIES.INCLUDES SUBHEADINGS SUPPORTED WITH REFERENCES. BASIC DISCUSSION
OF SELECTED NONPF COMPETENCIES. INCLUDES SUBHEADINGS SUPPORTED WITH REFERENCES.
LITTLE OR VERY GENERAL DISCUSSION OF NONPF COMPETENCIES. LITTLE OR NO
SUBHEADINGS OR REFERENCES. NO DISCUSSION OF SELECTED NONPF COMPETENCIES.
DESCRIPTION OF THE APN LEADER INTERVIEWED 30 POINTS 26 POINTS 24 POINTS 11
POINTS 0 POINTS PROVIDES A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE APN LEADER SELECTED FOR
THIS INTERVIEW. INCLUDES RELEVANT INFORMATION REGARDING THE RATIONALE FOR
CHOOSING THE APN LEADER, THE APN’S ROLE AND SCOPE, PRACTICE DETAILS, PRACTICE
LOCATION, AND PATIENT POPULATION. PROVIDES A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE APN
INTERVIEWED, BUT THE RELEVANT DETAILS REGARDING THE LEADER’S PRACTICE NEED
FURTHER EXPLANATION. PROVIDES A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE APN INTERVIEWED, BUT
IS MISSING RELEVANT DETAILS REGARDING THE LEADER’S PRACTICE. PROVIDES SOME
INFORMATION REGARDING THE APN INTERVIEWED. MISSING ALL RELEVANT DETAILS ABOUT
THE LEADER’S PRACTICE. DOES NOT INCLUDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE APN LEADER
INTERVIEWED. ANALYSIS OF THE DISCUSSED APN COMPETENCIES 40 POINTS 35 POINTS 32
POINTS 15 POINTS 0 POINTS EXCELLENT ANALYSIS OF 4-5 SELECTED APN COMPETENCIES
WITH APPLICATION TO APN ROLE, AND USE OF ORIGINAL SOURCE. GOOD ANALYSIS OF
SELECTED APN COMPETENCIES WITH APPLICATION TO APN ROLE, AND USE OF ORIGINAL
SOURCE. BASIC ANALYSIS OF SELECTED APN COMPETENCIES AND/OR ANALYSIS OF APN
COMPETENCIES NOT SUPPORTED WITH ORIGINAL SOURCE. LITTLE OR VERY GENERAL
ANALYSIS OF APN COMPETENCIES, OR MISSING ONE OR MORE OF THE ORIGINAL SOURCE(S).
LITTLE OR NO APPLICATION TO INTERVIEW AND/OR APN ROLE. NO ANALYSIS OF APN
COMPETENCIES PROVIDED. CONCLUSION 20 POINTS 18 POINTS 16 POINTS 8 POINTS 0
POINTS EXCELLENT UNDERSTANDING OF APN COMPETENCIES. CONCLUSIONS ARE WELL
EVIDENCED AND FULLY DEVELOPED. GOOD UNDERSTANDING AND/OR LIMITED USE OF APN
COMPETENCIES.CONCLUSIONS ARE WELL EVIDENCED AND FULLY DEVELOPED. BASIC
UNDERSTANDING AND/OR LIMITED USE OF APN COMPETENCIES AND/OR INAPPROPRIATE
EMPHASIS ON AN AREA. LITTLE UNDERSTANDING OF APPLICATION OF APN COMPETENCIES TO
ROLE. LITTLE TO NO EXPLANATION; INAPPROPRIATE EMPHASIS ON AN AREA. NO
UNDERSTANDING OF THE APPLICATION OF APN COMPETENCIES TO THE ROLE PROVIDED.
CONTENT SUBTOTAL _____OF 130 POINTS FORMAT POSSIBLE POINTS = 20 POINTS CLARITY
OF WRITING 15 POINTS 13 POINTS 12 POINTS 6 POINTS 0 POINTS EXCELLENT USE OF STANDARD
ENGLISH SHOWING ORIGINAL THOUGHT. NO SPELLING OR GRAMMAR ERRORS. WELL ORGANIZED
WITH PROPER FLOW OF MEANING. GOOD EVIDENCE OF OWN EXPRESSION AND COMPETENT USE
OF LANGUAGE. NO MORE THAN TWO SPELLING OR GRAMMAR ERRORS. WELL ORGANIZED
THOUGHTS AND CONCEPTS. SOME EVIDENCE OF OWN EXPRESSION AND COMPETENT USE OF
LANGUAGE. NO MORE THAN THREE SPELLING OR GRAMMAR ERRORS. WELL ORGANIZED
THOUGHTS AND CONCEPTS. LANGUAGE NEEDS DEVELOPMENT. FOUR-TO-SIX SPELLING AND/OR
GRAMMAR ERRORS. POORLY ORGANIZED THOUGHTS AND CONCEPTS. MORE THAN SIX SPELLING
AND/OR GRAMMAR ERRORS. POORLY ORGANIZED THOUGHTS AND CONCEPTS OR EXCEEDS THE
MAXIMUM LIMIT OF 6 PAGES. APA FORMAT 5 POINTS 4 POINTS 3POINTS 2 POINTS 0
POINTS APA FORMAT, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, AND/OR PUNCTUATION ARE ACCURATE, OR WITH
ZERO TO ONE ERRORS. TWO TO FOUR ERRORS IN APA FORMAT, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, AND
SYNTAX NOTED. FIVE TO SEVEN ERRORS IN APA FORMAT, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, AND SYNTAX
NOTED. EIGHT TO NINE ERRORS IN APA FORMAT, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, AND SYNTAX NOTED.
POST CONTAINS GREATER THAN TEN ERRORS IN APA FORMAT, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, AND/OR
PUNCTUATION OR REPEATEDLY MAKES THE SAME ERRORS AFTER FACULTY FEEDBACK. FORMAT
SUBTOTAL _____OF 20 POINTS TOTAL POINTS _____OF 150 POINTS
NR 510 WEEK 3 APN LEADER
INTERVIEW PROJECT – LATEST
GUIDELINESWITH SCORING RUBRIC PURPOSE THE
PURPOSE OF THIS APPLICATION IS TO PROVIDE THE STUDENT AN OPPORTUNITY TO
INTERVIEW AN ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSE (APN) LEADER ABOUT COMPETENCIES NECESSARY
FOR APN ROLE DEVELOPMENT. COURSE OUTCOMES THROUGH THIS ASSIGNMENT, THE STUDENT
WILL DEMONSTRATE THE ABILITY TO: CO 2: INTEGRATE INTERPROFESSIONAL
COLLABORATION AND INNOVATIVE COMMUNICATION TO SUPPORT AND PROMOTE THE
TEACHING-COACHING FUNCTION OF ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSING (PO 3). CO3: ASSIMILATE
PRIMARY CARE COMPETENCIES INTO APN/SPECIALTY NURSE PRACTITIONER PRACTICE THAT
EXEMPLIFY PROFESSIONAL VALUES, SCHOLARSHIP, SERVICE, AND CULTURALLY COMPETENT
GLOBAL AWARENESS AND SUPPORT ONGOING PROFESSIONAL AND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT (PO
5). CO7: CRITICALLY ANALYZE LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY ISSUES INCLUDING
INDEPENDENT PRACTICE AND RESTRAINT OF TRADE, AND BUSINESS AND LEGAL
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FOUR ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSING ROLES OF CNS, CNP, CNM, AND
CRNA (PO 1, 9). CO8: EXAMINE THE CONTRIBUTION OF VARIOUS INTERPROFESSIONAL COLLABORATION
RESOURCES INCLUDING THE ROLE DIMENSION OF CONSULTANT FOR ADVANCED PRACTICE
NURSING(PO 3). CO9: EVALUATE STRATEGIES FOR CONTRACT NEGOTIATION, CV/RESUME
WRITING, CREDENTIALING, NATIONAL BOARD CERTIFICATION, HOSPITAL PRIVILEGES, AND
REIMBURSEMENT(PO 8). CO10: DEVELOP VISIONARY LEADERSHIP SKILLS THAT COMBINE
BEST EVIDENCE WITH NURSING EXPERTISE TO SUPPORT QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, SAFETY,
AND CHANGE ACROSS HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS AND SYSTEMS (PO 1, 3, 8, 9). CO11:
DIFFERENTIATE LEADERSHIP STRATEGIES THAT STRENGTHEN INTERPROFESSIONAL
COLLABORATION AND INCORPORATE AN ETHIC OF CARE, VALUES, AND ETHICAL PRINCIPLES
INTO THE ROLE OF THE NURSE LEADER ACROSS HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS AND SYSTEMS
(PO 2, 4, 5, 6, 7). DUE DATE:SUNDAY 11:59 P.M. MT AT THE END OF WEEK 3 TOTAL
POINTS POSSIBLE: 150 REQUIREMENTS: 1. TO COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION, YOU WILL
NEED TO ACCESS TO THE FOLLOWING DATABASES: CINAHL, MEDLINE, COCHRANE LIBRARY,
AND THE JOANNA BRIGGS INSTITUTE. YOU MAY ACCESS THESE DATABASES THROUGH THE
CHAMBERLAIN COLLEGE OF NURSING ONLINE LIBRARY 2. THEAPN LEADER INTERVIEW
PROJECT WILL BE GRADED ON QUALITY OF INFORMATION, USE OF CITATIONS, USE OF
STANDARD ENGLISH GRAMMAR, SENTENCE STRUCTURE, AND OVERALL ORGANIZATION BASED ON
THE REQUIRED COMPONENTS AS SUMMARIZED IN THE DIRECTIONS AND GRADING
CRITERIA/RUBRIC. 3. CREATE YOUR REPORT USING MICROSOFT WORD 2007 (A PART OF
MICROSOFT OFFICE 2007), WHICH IS THE REQUIRED FORMAT FOR ALL CHAMBERLAIN
COLLEGE OF NURSING DOCUMENTS. YOU CAN TELL THAT THE DOCUMENT IS SAVED AS A MS
WORD 2007 DOCUMENT BECAUSE IT WILL END IN “.DOCX” 4. FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS AND
GRADING CRITERIA CLOSELY. ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS PROJECT MAY BE POSTED UNDER
THE Q & A FORUM. 5. THE LENGTH OF THE PROJECT REPORT IS TO BE NO LESS THAN
5 AND NO GREATER THAN 6 PAGES EXCLUDING TITLE PAGE AND REFERENCE PAGES. 6. APA
(2010) FORMAT IS REQUIRED WITH BOTH A TITLE PAGE AND REFERENCE PAGE. USE THE
REQUIRED COMPONENTS OF THE REVIEW AS LEVEL 1 HEADERS (UPPER AND LOWER CASE,
CENTERED): A. INTRODUCTION B. DESCRIPTION OF THE 9 NONPF NP CORE COMPETENCIES
C. DESCRIPTION OF THE INTERVIEW WITH THE APN. D. ANALYSIS OF THE DISCUSSED APN
COMPETENCIES E. CONCLUSION PREPARING THE PAPER THE FOLLOWING ARE BEST PRACTICES
FOR PREPARING THIS PROJECT PAPER: 1. READ “.OUTLOOK/KIB4CNGZ/INTERVIEW%20SUGGESTIONS%20AND%20TIPS.PDF”>INTERVIEW
SUGGESTIONS AND TIPS” IN COURSE RESOURCES. 2. REVIEW THE
9.OUTLOOK/WEEK%204%20DISCUSSION%20AND%20ASSIGNMENT/NONPF%20CORE%20COMPETENCIES.PDF”>NONPF
NURSE PRACTITIONER CORE COMPETENCIES. 3. IDENTIFY AN APN WITH WHOM TO CONDUCT
AN INTERVIEW. THE APN SHOULD PRACTICE IN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING ROLES: CNS, CNP,
CNM, OR CRNA. 4. WHEN CONDUCTING THE INTERVIEW, BE SURE TO IDENTIFY APPROPRIATE
BACKGROUND INFORMATION REGARDING THE INTERVIEWEE (WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN, AND
WHY). 5. DISCUSS4-5 APN CORE COMPETENCIES WITH THE INTERVIEWEE. BE SURE TO
IDENTIFY APPROPRIATE DETAILS INCLUDING RELEVANT PRACTICE EXAMPLES GLEANED FROM
THE APN LEADER. 6. WHEN ANALYZING THE DISCUSSED APN COMPETENCIES, BE SURE TO
FULLY ADDRESS EACH APN COMPETENCY DISCUSSED IN TERMS OF ORIGINAL SOURCE AND
LEADER’S APPLICATION TO APN ROLE (I.E., NURSE PRACTITIONER CORE COMPETENCIES
[NONPF, 2011]). 7. CONCLUDE THE PAPER WITH A SUMMARY OF THE MAIN POINTS COVERED
IN THE PAPER AND THE BENEFITS OF MEETING THE COMPETENCIES WITHIN THE APN ROLE.
REFERENCE NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONER FACULTY [NONPF]. (2011).
NURSE PRACTITIONER CORE COMPETENCIES.WASHINGTON, DC: AUTHOR. CATEGORY POINTS %
DESCRIPTION INTRODUCTION 10 6 INTRODUCES THE INTERVIEW, PURPOSE OF THE INTERVIEW,
AND PROVIDES RATIONALE FOR ENGAGED INTERVIEW PROCESS. DESCRIPTION OF THE NONPF
CORE COMPETENCIES 30 20 PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE SUMMARY OF THE 9 NONPFCORE
COMPETENCIES AS THEY RELATE TO APN PRACTICE. DESCRIPTION OF THE APN
LEADERINTERVIEWED 30 20 PROVIDE A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE APN LEADER SELECTED
FOR THIS INTERVIEW. INCLUDE RELEVANT INFORMATION REGARDING THE RATIONALE FOR
CHOOSING THE APN LEADER, THE APN’S ROLE AND SCOPE, PRACTICE DETAILS, PRACTICE
LOCATION, AND PATIENT POPULATION. ANALYSIS OF THE DISCUSSED APN COMPETENCIES 40
26 INCLUDE 4-5 SELECTED APN COMPETENCIES DISCUSSED IN TERMS OF ORIGINAL SOURCE
AND LEADER’S APPLICATION TO APN ROLE. INCLUDE SUBHEADINGS AS NEEDED. USE
EXAMPLES FROM THE INTERVIEW THAT SUPPORT YOUR ASSERTIONS AS WELL AS RELEVANT
EXAMPLES FROM THE APN LEADER’S ADVANCED PRACTICE SITUATION AND PERSPECTIVE.
CONCLUSION 20 13 AN EFFECTIVE CONCLUSION IDENTIFIES THE MAIN IDEAS AND MAJOR
CONCLUSIONS FROM THE BODY OF YOUR REPORT. MINOR DETAILS SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED.
SUMMARIZE THE BENEFITS OF MEETING SELECTED APN COMPETENCIES WITHIN THE APN
ROLE. CLARITY OF WRITING 15 10 USE OF STANDARD ENGLISH GRAMMAR AND SENTENCE
STRUCTURE. NO SPELLING ERRORS OR TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS. ORGANIZED AROUND THE
REQUIRED COMPONENTS USING APPROPRIATE HEADERS.ADHERES TO THE PAGE LIMIT OF 5-6
PAGES. APA FORMAT 5 5 ALL INFORMATION TAKEN FROM ANOTHER SOURCE, EVEN IF
SUMMARIZED, MUST BE APPROPRIATELY CITED IN THE REPORT (INCLUDING CITATION OF
INTERVIEW) AND LISTED IN THE REFERENCES USING APA (6TH ED.) FORMAT: DOCUMENT SETUP
TITLE AND REFERENCE PAGES CITATIONS IN THE TEXT AND REFERENCES. TOTAL 150 100 A
QUALITY ASSIGNMENT WILL MEET OR EXCEED ALL OF THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS. GRADING
RUBRIC ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA EXCEPTIONAL OUTSTANDING OR HIGHEST LEVEL OF
PERFORMANCE EXCEEDS VERY GOOD OR HIGH LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE MEETSSATISFACTORY
LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE NEEDS IMPROVEMENT POOR OR FAILING LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE
DEVELOPING UNSATISFACTORY LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE CONTENT POSSIBLE POINTS = 150
INTRODUCTION 10 POINTS 9 POINTS 8 POINTS 4 POINTS 0 POINTS EXCELLENT
INTRODUCTION OF INTERVIEW PROCESS. RATIONALE IS WELL PRESENTED AND PURPOSE
FULLY DEVELOPED. THESIS STATEMENT IS WELL WRITTEN. GOOD UNDERSTANDING AND USE
OF INTERVIEW APPLICATION.THESIS STATEMENT NEEDS FURTHER DEVELOPMENT. BASIC
UNDERSTANDING AND/OR LIMITED USE OF INTERVIEW APPLICATION AND/OR INAPPROPRIATE
EMPHASIS ON AN AREA. THESIS STATEMENT NEEDS DEVELOPMENT. LITTLE OR VERY GENERAL
INTRODUCTION OF INTERVIEW PROCESS. LITTLE TO NO EXPLANATION; INAPPROPRIATE
EMPHASIS ON AN AREA. MISSING THESIS STATEMENT. NO INTRODUCTION PROVIDED.
DESCRIPTION OF THE NONPF CORE COMPETENCIES 30 POINTS 26 POINTS 24 POINTS 11
POINTS 0 POINTS EXCELLENT DISCUSSION OF THE 9 NONPF COMPETENCIES. INCLUDES
SUBHEADINGS SUPPORTED WITH REFERENCES. GOOD DISCUSSION OF SELECTED NONPF
COMPETENCIES.INCLUDES SUBHEADINGS SUPPORTED WITH REFERENCES. BASIC DISCUSSION
OF SELECTED NONPF COMPETENCIES. INCLUDES SUBHEADINGS SUPPORTED WITH REFERENCES.
LITTLE OR VERY GENERAL DISCUSSION OF NONPF COMPETENCIES. LITTLE OR NO
SUBHEADINGS OR REFERENCES. NO DISCUSSION OF SELECTED NONPF COMPETENCIES.
DESCRIPTION OF THE APN LEADER INTERVIEWED 30 POINTS 26 POINTS 24 POINTS 11
POINTS 0 POINTS PROVIDES A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE APN LEADER SELECTED FOR
THIS INTERVIEW. INCLUDES RELEVANT INFORMATION REGARDING THE RATIONALE FOR
CHOOSING THE APN LEADER, THE APN’S ROLE AND SCOPE, PRACTICE DETAILS, PRACTICE
LOCATION, AND PATIENT POPULATION. PROVIDES A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE APN
INTERVIEWED, BUT THE RELEVANT DETAILS REGARDING THE LEADER’S PRACTICE NEED FURTHER
EXPLANATION. PROVIDES A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE APN INTERVIEWED, BUT IS
MISSING RELEVANT DETAILS REGARDING THE LEADER’S PRACTICE. PROVIDES SOME
INFORMATION REGARDING THE APN INTERVIEWED. MISSING ALL RELEVANT DETAILS ABOUT
THE LEADER’S PRACTICE. DOES NOT INCLUDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE APN LEADER
INTERVIEWED. ANALYSIS OF THE DISCUSSED APN COMPETENCIES 40 POINTS 35 POINTS 32
POINTS 15 POINTS 0 POINTS EXCELLENT ANALYSIS OF 4-5 SELECTED APN COMPETENCIES
WITH APPLICATION TO APN ROLE, AND USE OF ORIGINAL SOURCE. GOOD ANALYSIS OF
SELECTED APN COMPETENCIES WITH APPLICATION TO APN ROLE, AND USE OF ORIGINAL
SOURCE. BASIC ANALYSIS OF SELECTED APN COMPETENCIES AND/OR ANALYSIS OF APN
COMPETENCIES NOT SUPPORTED WITH ORIGINAL SOURCE. LITTLE OR VERY GENERAL
ANALYSIS OF APN COMPETENCIES, OR MISSING ONE OR MORE OF THE ORIGINAL SOURCE(S).
LITTLE OR NO APPLICATION TO INTERVIEW AND/OR APN ROLE. NO ANALYSIS OF APN
COMPETENCIES PROVIDED. CONCLUSION 20 POINTS 18 POINTS 16 POINTS 8 POINTS 0
POINTS EXCELLENT UNDERSTANDING OF APN COMPETENCIES. CONCLUSIONS ARE WELL
EVIDENCED AND FULLY DEVELOPED. GOOD UNDERSTANDING AND/OR LIMITED USE OF APN
COMPETENCIES.CONCLUSIONS ARE WELL EVIDENCED AND FULLY DEVELOPED. BASIC
UNDERSTANDING AND/OR LIMITED USE OF APN COMPETENCIES AND/OR INAPPROPRIATE EMPHASIS
ON AN AREA. LITTLE UNDERSTANDING OF APPLICATION OF APN COMPETENCIES TO ROLE.
LITTLE TO NO EXPLANATION; INAPPROPRIATE EMPHASIS ON AN AREA. NO UNDERSTANDING
OF THE APPLICATION OF APN COMPETENCIES TO THE ROLE PROVIDED. CONTENT SUBTOTAL
_____OF 130 POINTS FORMAT POSSIBLE POINTS = 20 POINTS CLARITY OF WRITING 15
POINTS 13 POINTS 12 POINTS 6 POINTS 0 POINTS EXCELLENT USE OF STANDARD ENGLISH
SHOWING ORIGINAL THOUGHT. NO SPELLING OR GRAMMAR ERRORS. WELL ORGANIZED WITH
PROPER FLOW OF MEANING. GOOD EVIDENCE OF OWN EXPRESSION AND COMPETENT USE OF
LANGUAGE. NO MORE THAN TWO SPELLING OR GRAMMAR ERRORS. WELL ORGANIZED THOUGHTS
AND CONCEPTS. SOME EVIDENCE OF OWN EXPRESSION AND COMPETENT USE OF LANGUAGE. NO
MORE THAN THREE SPELLING OR GRAMMAR ERRORS. WELL ORGANIZED THOUGHTS AND
CONCEPTS. LANGUAGE NEEDS DEVELOPMENT. FOUR-TO-SIX SPELLING AND/OR GRAMMAR
ERRORS. POORLY ORGANIZED THOUGHTS AND CONCEPTS. MORE THAN SIX SPELLING AND/OR
GRAMMAR ERRORS. POORLY ORGANIZED THOUGHTS AND CONCEPTS OR EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM
LIMIT OF 6 PAGES. APA FORMAT 5 POINTS 4 POINTS 3POINTS 2 POINTS 0 POINTS APA
FORMAT, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, AND/OR PUNCTUATION ARE ACCURATE, OR WITH ZERO TO ONE
ERRORS. TWO TO FOUR ERRORS IN APA FORMAT, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, AND SYNTAX NOTED.
FIVE TO SEVEN ERRORS IN APA FORMAT, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, AND SYNTAX NOTED. EIGHT
TO NINE ERRORS IN APA FORMAT, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, AND SYNTAX NOTED. POST
CONTAINS GREATER THAN TEN ERRORS IN APA FORMAT, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, AND/OR
PUNCTUATION OR REPEATEDLY MAKES THE SAME ERRORS AFTER FACULTY FEEDBACK. FORMAT
SUBTOTAL _____OF 20 POINTS TOTAL POINTS _____OF 150 POINTS
No comments:
Post a Comment